Stephen Hawking's Universe - EP1:Seeing Is Believing (1/ 5)
Видео закачал: Gravitationalist
Описание видеоролика:
Where did we come from? The history of cosmology from flat earth to Big Bang: Eratosthenes and Ptolemy, Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Newton, Edwin Hubble.
Тэги: Stephen Hawking Universe Big Bang Cosmology
Смотреть или закачать еще видео из категории "Howto"
Еще видео, закачанное автором видео Gravitationalist
Комментарии: Смотреть || Скрыть
Послать ссылку другу:






supernatural
man!
trolling young one
one is rational the other is, well, Bullocks!!
documentry
a talking snake to tell them how the world works? ... With all due respect, thats pathetic.
miracles, some of them talk in parables about certain realities... Do you think Jesus is a light bulb when he says he is the light? Or he thinks of himself as a yellow big road when he says he is the way?
gives birth to another
them talk about historical occurrences, others in poetry like psalms. The context is not hard to see if you take time and read carefully. The life of Jesus is historical, so is Moses, the book of revelation is not an exsact depiction, it even tells you it is a symbolism... I can PM you about the
life and why a creator is needed...
with all due respect science already showed me the bible is nonsense and the idea of a creator complete fantasy,id rather take hard solid evidence, which science provides, over basically a different way to look at a collection of fables
it goes outside the realm of the natural and steps into methaphycical and super natural explanations. Heck Hawkins has come up with sad arguments about infinite, unobserved unisverses creating other universes/ Buddy, life did not arose out of nothing, there is 0 proof for that. It has been prove
n to be impossible w/o intervention with each try.
say there is 0 proof for the big bang because there is 0 proof for gods as well.
everything as a possibility. My huge problem is that these people claim to know it all. That's my beef. Yeah, it's good to understand and explain nature, I love to read and see videos of how the planets are and why they're here. But these S.H. overdoes it with claims such as: We don't need God b
ecause we have the bubble universes. Really? I mean, bubble universes is one of the most horrible ideas yet. There's more proof for intelligent design than that. They're in denial.
claim. There is evidence on both sides of the spectacle, and if you study both evidences, you will see that the idea of life forming itself out of non-living material is simply impossible. It was tried before, and it was a failure, the more we've studied, it, the more we notice how impossible it
is. If the idea were good, it would have to be the opposite, "the more we know the easier" Not the contrary
his new book he says how Gravity created everything. He then goes into detail to explain how belief in God is the same as believing in Thor. And even dares to use the idea of parallell universes as an explanation of reality. I'm sorry, but this idea has 0 reliability. At least there is evidence
pointing to intelligent design. Pointing to multiple ever existing universes There's 0. Scientists should not do this, philosophers should.
that relies on intellectual evidence. I don't believe Jesus existesd just because someone told me to. I studied Jesus' history and studies extra biblical sources. By references from historians and local roman history, you can conclude that huge events happenned back then. The slaughter of the ea
rly christians that loved Jesus and denied worshipping ceasar was one of them.
bible gave us the creation story of adam and eve, science has unlocked the mysteries of stars, the bible claims them to be pin pricks in the night sky. And I have studied it and what I see is science has the answer, all I see from creationism is a combination of the bible and pseudo science :S
And science has actually gone some way to creating life from "nothing" look up stuff on RNA its very interesting
for answers the more questions come into the picture. All we can do is just enjoy the ride.
bang= Change,alteration=Time, but Not, this is impossible, the time didn´t exist before bing bang, what cause the change? because there was no time and no change
1:42 - 1:50
that madona!!! Good one hawking